Read this first: this case has nothing to do with Fiji the country. “Fiji” is the surname of the man who died. Dave Fiji was an American groom killed in a helicopter crash in the US state of Georgia on his wedding night, and neither of the two reports this article draws on connects him, the wedding venue or the helicopter operator to Fiji or anywhere in the Pacific. The surname on its own is enough to push the headline into searches and feeds for “Fiji crash”, where it can easily be mistaken for regional news. We are publishing this to settle that in one place — and because the argument at the centre of the lawsuit, over who carries the decision to fly when a paid-for charter lifts off in bad weather, is not confined to Georgia.
A newlywed is suing a Georgia wedding venue and a helicopter operator over the crash that killed her husband minutes after the couple left their own reception on 29 May, according to reports by KCRG and Yahoo. Jesni Sam survived. Her husband, Dave Fiji, and the pilot were killed. Her lawyers say she lay trapped in the wreckage for close to six hours, beneath her husband’s body, before rescuers reached her.
What the two reports establish
- Sam and Fiji married at The Revere, a wedding venue in Dawsonville, Georgia, in front of 400 guests, on 29 May.
- The couple left the venue by helicopter operated by Prestige Helicopters, bound for DeKalb-Peachtree Airport (PDK) in DeKalb County. They never arrived.
- KCRG reports the lawsuit puts the crash five minutes into the flight.
- The claim alleges The Revere and Prestige Helicopters were negligent and reckless in allowing the send-off to proceed while thunderstorm and low-visibility advisories were in force, and that the crash was preventable.
- Sam’s attorneys say she suffered physical injuries and has been dealing with mental health struggles since the crash, and that she is seeking damages and coverage of legal fees.
- The allegations have not been tested in court. Neither outlet names the court, gives a filing date, or sets out a hearing timetable.
Why the wedding venue is a defendant, not just the operator
Most claims after a fatal charter crash point at the aircraft, the operator and the person flying it. This one also points at the business that sold the moment.
Two details from Yahoo’s account do that work: the helicopter departure was part of a promotion from The Revere, and the aircraft left from a helicopter pad on the venue’s property. On that basis, Yahoo reports, the suit alleges the venue failed to put adequate safety standards or weather-cancellation procedures in place — procedures that, the plaintiffs argue, could have stopped the flight going ahead in dangerous conditions.
The practical claim, then, is that a venue which markets a helicopter exit and hosts the pad it leaves from cannot treat the weather call as somebody else’s responsibility.
Our read: why this framing matters beyond Georgia
What follows is our own assessment, not a finding reported by either outlet. Read as litigation strategy rather than as settled law, the venue’s inclusion is the part of this case most likely to travel. Anywhere that scenic flights, transfers and aerial send-offs are sold as an experience — at weddings, resorts, tourism operators — the same structural pressure exists: the pilot makes the final call, while the client, the schedule, the deposit and a waiting crowd all push in one direction. A claim that reaches past the operator to the seller of the experience asks whether that pressure should be answered with a written cancellation procedure rather than a judgement call on the night.
Whether a Georgia court accepts that argument is a separate question, and neither report indicates it has been ruled on. We flag it as a theory being tested, not as an obligation anyone currently carries.
What the lawsuit alleges
According to KCRG, the suit says the accident was preventable and that both The Revere and the helicopter operator acted negligently and recklessly in letting the departure proceed while thunderstorm and low-visibility advisories were in force. Yahoo adds that the plaintiffs accuse the two companies of failing to properly check the weather and of making a negligent decision to take off that night despite unsafe conditions.
Sam’s lawyer has cast the case as being about prevention as much as compensation. “Jesni’s lawsuit seeks answers and accountability for what happened to her and her husband, and she will fight to ensure that no newlywed couple ever suffers anything like this again,” Andrew Robb said in a statement quoted by Yahoo. In a passage carried by both outlets, Robb added: “In a matter of minutes, Jesni went from celebrating the happiest day of her life to experiencing something almost impossible to comprehend.”
Yahoo notes that Channel 2 Action News, the Atlanta television station, approached both The Revere and Prestige Helicopters for a response. No reply from either company appears in either report, and neither carries a defence filing — so only one side of this case is currently on the record.
Two unresolved threads that could decide it
Beyond the pleadings, both outlets gesture at two open lines of inquiry, each surfacing only through earlier headlines listed on Yahoo’s page.
The first is the official investigation. Yahoo lists earlier Channel 2 Action News reporting that the NTSB — the US National Transportation Safety Board — was investigating the crash. A probable-cause finding would bear directly on the weather allegations, since it would address what the conditions were and how the flight was dispatched. Neither report says whether the inquiry has concluded or what it has established so far.
The second is the flight plan. Yahoo’s page lists an earlier Channel 2 headline stating that no flight plan was filed for the helicopter. Nothing in either report explains whether a flight plan was required for this particular flight, who would have been responsible for filing one, or what weight its absence carries in a negligence claim. Until that is spelled out, it remains a headline rather than an established element of the case, and we are not treating it as one.
Who is bringing the case, and who is running it
The two accounts differ slightly on the plaintiffs. KCRG describes Sam as the person filing the wrongful death claim, while Yahoo reports the family is suing and that the claim is brought by Sam together with Fiji’s relatives.
On counsel, the reports line up: KCRG says Sam has retained an aviation-accident law firm based in Kansas City, and Yahoo identifies it as Robb & Robb LLC, with Andrew Robb a partner. KCRG notes the same firm represented Vanessa Bryant after the 2020 helicopter crash that killed her husband, the NBA player Kobe Bryant. Neither outlet draws a comparison between the two crashes, and neither do we. The narrower point is that specialist aviation counsel suggests a case built on flight records, weather data and operator procedure, rather than a straightforward dispute with a venue.
Where the reports diverge
Small discrepancies are worth recording, because these are the details that firm up as filings become public.
- Stage of the filing: Yahoo, publishing on 22 September 2026, says the lawsuit has been filed by Robb & Robb LLC; KCRG, publishing two days later, says Sam “is filing” the claim.
- Time trapped: KCRG says nearly six hours; Yahoo says six hours. (KCRG’s web address for the story also refers to a plane crash, though both outlets describe a helicopter.)
What we could not confirm
Neither report says where the helicopter came down, what the recorded weather was at the moment of take-off, what caused the crash, who employed the pilot, or whether any regulatory action has followed. Yahoo notes that Channel 2 Action News covered the crash in May, and the earlier headlines listed on its page include the identification of the pilot, a memorial service arranged by the groom’s family, and relatives describing Fiji as “precious, God-fearing”. We have not independently verified any element of the claim and have not spoken to the parties.
Before you share it as Fiji news
One practical note for readers seeing this circulate locally. A story is not a Fiji story because the word appears in it: check whether the place names, the courts and the authorities named are Fijian. Here they are not — Dawsonville, DeKalb County, the NTSB and a Kansas City law firm are all American, and “Fiji” attaches to a person, not a country. For domestic coverage, start with our Fiji news coverage.
We will update this report if a court date, a defence response or an NTSB finding is published.
More from Fiji News
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this a Fiji story, and why is a Fiji news site covering it?
It is not a Fiji story. "Fiji" is the surname of the man who died: Dave Fiji, an American groom killed in a helicopter crash in the US state of Georgia. Neither KCRG nor Yahoo connects him, the wedding venue or the helicopter operator to Fiji or the Pacific. Our reason for publishing is editorial rather than geographic: the surname alone is enough to drop the headline into searches and feeds for "Fiji crash", where it can be misread as regional news, and one clear explainer is more useful than leaving readers to guess. If you came looking for domestic news, our Fiji coverage is the place to start.
What in this story is established, and what is only an allegation?
Established in both reports: a wedding took place at The Revere in Dawsonville, Georgia; the couple left by helicopter operated by Prestige Helicopters; the aircraft crashed; Dave Fiji and the pilot were killed; Jesni Sam survived and was trapped in the wreckage for around six hours; a wrongful death claim has now been brought by the Kansas City firm Robb & Robb LLC. Contested and untested: that the flight should never have taken off, that the weather was not properly checked, that the venue lacked adequate safety standards or cancellation procedures, and that the crash was preventable. Those are pleadings, not findings. Neither outlet reports a response from either company or any defence filing.
Why does it matter that the venue, not only the helicopter operator, is being sued?
Because it shifts the go/no-go decision away from the cockpit alone. Yahoo reports the send-off was part of a promotion from The Revere and that the helicopter left from a pad on the venue’s property — the two details the claim leans on to argue the venue owed its own duty of care. Our read is that this is the aspect of the case worth watching for anyone who sells or books aerial add-ons at weddings, resorts or tourism venues, because it tests whether the seller of an experience can treat the weather call as purely the pilot’s problem. Neither report indicates a court has ruled on that framing.
Who is Jesni Sam’s law firm, and why is it significant?
KCRG reports she has retained an aviation-accident firm based in Kansas City; Yahoo names it as Robb & Robb LLC, with Andrew Robb a partner. KCRG notes the same firm represented Vanessa Bryant after the 2020 helicopter crash that killed her husband, the NBA player Kobe Bryant. Neither outlet compares the two crashes and neither do we. The point is narrower: specialist aviation counsel usually signals a case built around flight records, weather data and operator procedures rather than a straightforward contract dispute with a venue.
What should readers watch for next in this case?
Four things, none of them resolved in the current reporting: an NTSB probable-cause determination, which would speak directly to the weather allegations; clarification of the earlier Channel 2 Action News report that no flight plan was filed, including whether one was required for this flight and who was responsible for it; the first defence filings from The Revere and Prestige Helicopters; and basic case details that neither report supplies, such as the court, the filing date and any hearing timetable. Until the defence responds, only one side of the case is on the record.
